Toronto
The Ontario government is proposing to push through a bill that would close 10 supervised consumption sites without holding any public hearings, a move advocates and opposition critics say is anti-democratic.
Advocates and opposition critics say move is anti-democraticAllison Jones · The Canadian Press
· Posted: Nov 26, 2024 4:50 PM EST | Last Updated: 5 hours ago
Posters appear next to a doorway in Toronto, on Monday, Nov. 25, 2024, to highlight opposition to the Ontario government’s proposed closure of supervised consumption sites. Advocates say that the closure of consumption sites will lead to unsupervised consumption in open public spaces. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)The Ontario government is proposing to push through a bill that would close 10 supervised consumption sites without holding any public hearings, a move advocates and opposition critics say is anti-democratic.
The legislation seeks to prohibit and close any drug consumption sites that are within 200 metres of a school or daycare, and effectively prohibit any new sites from opening.
In their place, the government is launching 19 new “homelessness and addiction recovery treatment hubs” plus 375 highly supportive housing units at a planned cost of $378 million.
Government house leader Steve Clark has put forward a motion that would see the bill go straight from second reading to third reading, bypassing the committee stage that normally includes public hearings and consideration of amendments.
Health Minister Sylvia Jones made the consumption site announcement back in August, and now the government needs to get the bill through, Clark said.
“I sat here a couple of weeks ago and told you that I’d be using time allocation on some of the government’s bills,” Clark said after question period. “This is a government bill we need to get passed.”
The bill is one of a number of pieces of legislation the government is fast-tracking, which is fuelling speculation of a provincial election earlier than the set June 2026 date.
In addition to limiting debate time in the legislature on the bills, the government has for some of them either curtailed or entirely skipped the committee stage, in which organizations and members of the public speak about how a bill will affect them. A divisive bill that would prohibit and remove certain bike lanes had one day of public hearings.
Lorraine Lam, an outreach worker in downtown Toronto, says: ‘I think it says a lot that he’s not willing to hear the public opinions about what this decision is going to mean for so many people. I think if he did open this up for public hearings … the pushback would be huge.’ (Ethan Lang/CBC)’Pushback would be huge’ if hearings held, advocate saysLorraine Lam, an outreach worker in downtown Toronto, said Premier Doug Ford appears to be basing his government’s consumption-site legislation purely on the opinions of the sites’ opponents.
“I think it says a lot that he’s not willing to hear the public opinions about what this decision is going to mean for so many people,” she said.
“I think if he did open this up for public hearings … the pushback would be huge.”
Ford has often talked about hearing from people who are concerned about needles and drug use in communities near supervised consumption sites, particularly those near schools or daycares.
Lam said Ford’s framing of the issue as moving from supervised consumption to a rehabilitation focus is a “false binary,” saying those services can exist alongside consumption sites that save drug users’ lives.
“If anything, now he’s going to displace drug users into places that are public spaces like bus shelters, libraries and parks,” she said.
Bill could have deadly consequences, Liberal MPP saysLiberal health critic Adil Shamji said it is incumbent upon legislators to consider all aspects of such an important policy.
“This, if executed poorly, will lead to very dangerous and deadly consequences,” he said.
“We owe it to the democratic process, to the people of Ontario, to the families who have been impacted by people suffering from mental health and addictions challenges, to look at this legislation carefully, weigh it on its own merits and get as much feedback as we can so that we make the right decision, not the politically expedient one.”
Supporters and harm reduction workers stage a die-in outside of the Ontario legislature in Toronto on Monday, Oct. 21, 2024, as groups gather to protest against the Ontario government’s proposal to close supervised consumption sites. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)NDP Leader Marit Stiles said the government seems focused on finishing the legislative session as quickly as possible.
“They want to get out of here as fast as they can — they don’t want to hear from the experts, they don’t want to hear from the people who actually are on the front line, and they don’t want to hear from the people who are most impacted,” she said.
“We’re not talking about weeks and months. We’re talking about a few days of consultations, and they’re not even providing that.”
Posters highlight opposition to proposed closures of sitesMeanwhile, posters have appeared around Toronto, on bus shelters, near parking pads and the sides of boarded up buildings, to protest the proposed closures of supervised consumption sites in Ontario.
The posters, which contain an Ontario Health logo on the bottom right, are billed as an “Ontario Health Public Notice” and they say “Injection Site Relocation” adding “these locations will become an injection site.” A QR code on the bottom right leads to a site advocating to save consumption sites.
The posters say the “zoning change” will take effect on April 1, 2025, after the province shuts down 10 supervised consumption sites in Ontario, including five in Toronto.
Posters appear on bus shelters in Toronto, Monday Nov. 25, 2024, to highlight opposition to the Ontario Government’s proposed closure of supervised consumption sites. Advocates say that the closure of consumption sites will lead to unsupervised consumption in open public spaces. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)Lam said she thinks the messaging is accurate and she applauds whoever is behind the marketing campaign. If the province closes the sites, people will continue to use substances and will do so in public spaces and all over the community, she said.
“I think some of the spots actually match up to what I know in terms of paramedic responses. And so, I think it’s just telling, without the supervised sites, people are going to be using in whatever spaces they find.”
Ontario Health told CBC Toronto on Monday that it did not consent to the use of its logo on the posters and do not condone the improper use of it.
“Ontario Health has no involvement in these posters,” the agency said.
With files from Dale Manucdoc of CBC News